How To Prove A Florida Breach of Implied Contract Claim
In Florida, a claim of Breach of Implied Contract is defined as:
A Breach of an Implied Contract occurs when one party fails to honor their obligation, even if it is not in writing.
It simply means:
One party does not honor a verbal agreement.
There are 4 elements of the claim:
- Element 1. The plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant. The plaintiff provided something valuable or helpful to the defendant, which the defendant accepted or used, creating a situation where it would be unfair for the defendant not to acknowledge or compensate for that benefit.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The plaintiff provided the defendant with valuable services that enhanced the defendant’s business operations without any formal agreement in place.
* The plaintiff delivered goods to the defendant, which the defendant accepted and utilized, leading to an increase in the defendant’s sales.
* The plaintiff invested time and resources into a project that directly benefited the defendant, resulting in improved efficiency and cost savings.
* The plaintiff shared proprietary information with the defendant, which the defendant used to gain a competitive advantage in the market.
* The plaintiff performed work for the defendant under the assumption of compensation, which the defendant acknowledged but never formally agreed to pay. - Element 2. The defendant had knowledge of the benefit received from plaintiff. In a breach of implied contract claim, this element means that the defendant was aware they gained something valuable from the plaintiff’s actions or services, suggesting they should have recognized their responsibility to compensate or acknowledge that benefit.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant acknowledged receipt of the plaintiff’s services in multiple emails, expressing appreciation for the assistance provided.
* The defendant directly communicated with the plaintiff regarding the value of the services rendered, indicating an understanding of the benefits received.
* The defendant made payments to the plaintiff, which demonstrates recognition of the value of the services provided.
* The defendant’s business operations were significantly improved due to the plaintiff’s contributions, which were discussed in meetings.
* The defendant referred other clients to the plaintiff, suggesting an awareness of the benefits gained from the plaintiff’s work. - Element 3. The defendant accepted or retained the conferred benefit. The defendant received or kept something of value that was given to them, which they were not supposed to have without paying for it, indicating they accepted the benefit and may be responsible for fulfilling the implied agreement.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant continued to use the services provided by the plaintiff for several months without objection or payment.
* The defendant acknowledged receipt of the goods and expressed satisfaction with their quality in written correspondence.
* The defendant made no effort to return the conferred benefit despite being aware of the plaintiff’s expectations for compensation.
* The defendant incorporated the plaintiff’s work into their own projects, thereby deriving financial gain from the benefit received.
* The defendant’s employees utilized the plaintiff’s services regularly, indicating acceptance of the benefit conferred. - Element 4. The circumstances are such that it would be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without paying fair value for it. In simple terms, this means that if someone unfairly gains from a situation or benefit without paying what it’s worth, it wouldn’t be right for them to keep it without compensating the other party involved.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant received a substantial benefit from the plaintiff’s services, which were provided under the assumption of compensation.
* The plaintiff incurred significant expenses while fulfilling their obligations, expecting to be compensated for their efforts.
* The defendant has continued to use the plaintiff’s work without any payment or acknowledgment, despite repeated requests for compensation.
* The plaintiff’s contributions directly enhanced the defendant’s business operations, leading to increased profits that the defendant has not shared.
* The defendant’s refusal to pay for the benefits received has caused financial strain on the plaintiff, who relied on the expected payment.
(See Commerce P’ship 8098 Ltd. P’ship v. Equity Contracting Co., Inc., 695 So. 2d 383, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).)
If you’re in court without a lawyer and plan to assert a Claim of Breach of Implied Contract, having a Personal Practice of Law at Courtroom5 is essential. You’ll need to make informed decisions about what to file at each phase of your case and prepare legal documents supported by thorough legal research and a strong analysis of the facts. Equip yourself with the tools and knowledge to effectively navigate your legal journey.
Prove Your FL Breach of Implied Contract Claim
U.S. Civil Cases Only