How To Prove A California Workplace Discrimination Claim

 

How To Prove A California Workplace Discrimination Claim

 

In California, a claim of Workplace Discrimination is defined as:

Unequal treatment of persons, for a reason that has nothing to do with legal rights or ability. Federal and state laws prohibit discrimination in employment, availability of housing, rates of pay, right to promotion, educational opportunity, civil rights, and use of facilities based on race, nationality, creed, color, age, sex, or sexual orientation. These are protected groups.

It simply means:

Companies cannot discriminate on the basis of race, nationality, creed, color, age, sex, or sexual orientation.

There are 4 elements of the claim:

  • Element 1. The plaintiff was a member of a protected class. The plaintiff belongs to a group that is legally protected from discrimination, such as based on race, gender, age, or disability, meaning they have specific rights to fair treatment in the workplace.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The plaintiff is a 45-year-old female, which places her in a protected class based on age and gender.
    * The plaintiff is a member of a racial minority group, specifically identifying as Hispanic.
    * The plaintiff has a documented disability, qualifying her for protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    * The plaintiff practices a recognized religion, which is evident in her request for religious accommodations at work.
    * The plaintiff is a veteran, thus entitled to protections under laws that safeguard against discrimination based on military status.

  • Element 2. The plaintiff was qualified for the position he or she sought or was performing competently in the position held. The plaintiff must show that they were either qualified for the job they wanted or were doing their current job well, which is an important part of proving their case in a workplace discrimination claim.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The plaintiff consistently received positive performance reviews from supervisors, highlighting their strong work ethic and contributions to team projects.
    * The plaintiff met or exceeded all job requirements and performance metrics set forth in their position description throughout their employment.
    * The plaintiff successfully completed all required training and certifications relevant to their role, demonstrating their qualifications for the position.
    * The plaintiff was recognized by peers and management for their leadership skills and ability to mentor new employees effectively.
    * The plaintiff maintained a record of punctuality and attendance that was above the company average, reflecting their commitment to the job.

  • Element 3. The plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, such as termination, demotion, or denial of an available job. The plaintiff experienced a negative change in their job situation, like being fired, getting a lower position, or being passed over for a job, which is a key part of proving they faced discrimination at work.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The plaintiff was terminated from their position without prior warning or a performance review, despite consistently meeting job expectations.
    * The plaintiff was demoted from a managerial role to a lower position after reporting discriminatory behavior by a supervisor.
    * The plaintiff applied for a promotion that was given to a less qualified candidate, who did not share the plaintiff’s protected characteristic.
    * The plaintiff’s hours were significantly reduced after they filed a complaint regarding workplace discrimination, impacting their income and job security.
    * The plaintiff was denied a transfer to a desired position, while similarly qualified colleagues were granted the opportunity, raising concerns of bias.

  • Element 4. The circumstances suggested a discriminatory motive. The situation indicated that unfair treatment was likely based on a person’s race, gender, or other protected characteristic, rather than on their job performance or qualifications, which is a key factor in proving workplace discrimination.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The employee was consistently given less favorable assignments compared to colleagues of a different demographic group, despite having similar qualifications and experience.
    * During performance reviews, the employee received lower ratings than peers, even when their work output was comparable or superior.
    * The supervisor made derogatory comments about the employee’s background during team meetings, creating a hostile work environment.
    * The employee was passed over for promotion in favor of less qualified candidates who belonged to a different demographic group.
    * After filing a complaint about discrimination, the employee faced increased scrutiny and was subjected to unwarranted disciplinary actions.

(See Scotch v. Art Institute of California, 173 Cal. App. 4th 986 (Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dist., 3rd Div. 2009).)
If you’re in court without a lawyer and plan to assert a Claim of Workplace Discrimination, having a Personal Practice of Law at Courtroom5 is essential. You’ll need to make informed decisions about what to file at each phase of your case and prepare legal documents that are supported by thorough legal research and a strong analysis of the facts. Equip yourself with the tools and knowledge to effectively navigate your Workplace Discrimination claim.

Prove Your CA Workplace Discrimination Claim

U.S. Civil Cases Only

Just a moment please.