How To Prove A California Assault Claim

In California, a claim of Assault is defined as:
Assault is a threat or attempt to inflict offensive physical contact or bodily harm on a person (as by lifting a fist in a threatening manner) that puts the person in immediate danger of or in fear of such harm or contact
It simply means:
Using threats or force to make someone believe they are going to be physically harmed.
There are 5 elements of the claim:
- Element 1. The defendant committed an act with intent to cause harmful or offensive contact or threatened to touch plaintiff in a harmful or offensive manner. The defendant either tried to physically harm the plaintiff or made a threat that suggested they would do so, showing a clear intention to cause pain or offense.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant raised their fist and moved toward the plaintiff in a threatening manner, causing the plaintiff to fear imminent harm.
* The defendant verbally threatened to hit the plaintiff while standing just inches away, creating a reasonable apprehension of harmful contact.
* The defendant intentionally pushed the plaintiff during an argument, resulting in physical contact that was both harmful and offensive.
* The defendant swung a baseball bat in the direction of the plaintiff, demonstrating a clear intent to cause harmful contact.
* The defendant made repeated aggressive gestures toward the plaintiff, indicating a desire to provoke a physical confrontation. - Element 2. The plaintiff reasonably believed she or he was about to be touched in a harmful or offensive manner, or it reasonably appeared to plaintiff that defendant was about to carry out the threat. The plaintiff felt they were about to be harmed or offended by the defendant’s actions, or it seemed likely that the defendant would follow through on a threatening gesture, making the plaintiff believe they were in immediate danger.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant raised their fist and moved toward the plaintiff in a threatening manner, causing the plaintiff to feel immediate fear of being struck.
* The defendant verbally threatened the plaintiff while advancing toward them, creating a reasonable belief that physical harm was imminent.
* The plaintiff observed the defendant brandishing a weapon and felt a genuine fear for their safety, believing an attack was about to occur.
* The defendant’s aggressive posture and loud shouting in close proximity to the plaintiff led the plaintiff to reasonably perceive an imminent threat of harm.
* The plaintiff witnessed the defendant’s previous violent behavior, which contributed to a reasonable belief that they were about to be harmed. - Element 3. The plaintiff did not consent to defendant’s conduct. In an assault claim, this element means that the person who was harmed did not agree to or allow the actions of the other person, indicating that the harmful behavior was unwanted and uninvited.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The plaintiff explicitly told the defendant to stop their actions multiple times during the encounter.
* The plaintiff was not aware of the defendant’s intentions and felt threatened by their behavior.
* The plaintiff had previously communicated their boundaries to the defendant, which were disregarded.
* The plaintiff was in a vulnerable state and unable to give informed consent at the time of the incident.
* The defendant did not seek or obtain permission from the plaintiff before engaging in the conduct. - Element 4. The plaintiff was harmed. The plaintiff was harmed means that the person who is suing experienced some form of injury or damage, whether physical, emotional, or psychological, as a result of the defendant’s actions, which is a key part of proving an assault claim.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The plaintiff experienced physical injuries, including bruises and cuts, as a direct result of the defendant’s actions.
* The plaintiff suffered emotional distress, leading to anxiety and fear, after the threatening encounter with the defendant.
* The plaintiff required medical treatment for injuries sustained during the incident, incurring significant medical expenses.
* The plaintiff was unable to participate in daily activities and work for several weeks due to the harm caused by the defendant.
* Witnesses observed the plaintiff visibly shaken and in distress immediately following the assault, indicating psychological harm. - Element 5. The defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s harm. The defendant’s actions played a significant role in causing the harm that the plaintiff experienced, meaning that without what the defendant did, the plaintiff likely would not have suffered the injury or distress they are claiming.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The defendant approached the plaintiff aggressively, invading their personal space and making threatening gestures.
* The defendant verbally threatened the plaintiff, causing them to fear imminent harm.
* Witnesses observed the defendant’s actions and confirmed that the plaintiff appeared genuinely frightened during the encounter.
* The plaintiff experienced anxiety and distress immediately following the defendant’s aggressive behavior.
* Medical records indicate that the plaintiff sought treatment for emotional distress directly related to the incident involving the defendant.
(See So v. Shin, 212 Cal. App. 4th 652 – Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dist., 4th Div. 2013. Plotnik v. Meihaus (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1590, 1603-1604 [146 Cal.Rptr.3d 585]. California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI), No. 1301.)
If you’re in court without a lawyer and plan to assert a Claim of Assault, having a Personal Practice of Law at Courtroom5 is essential. You’ll need to make informed decisions about what to file at each phase of your case and prepare legal documents supported by thorough legal research and a strong analysis of the facts. Equip yourself with the tools and knowledge to effectively navigate your Claim of Assault.
U.S. Civil Cases Only