How To Prove A Texas Breach of Warranty Claim
In Texas, a claim of Breach of Warranty is defined as:
A Breach of Warranty occurs when a seller promises that goods will conform to a certain standard, and the promise becomes part of the basis of the bargain, and the defendant does not keep his or her promise.
It simply means:
The seller of a product is liable when the product or service fails to meet promises that were made about that product or service.
There are 6 elements of the claim:
- Element 1. There was an express affirmation of fact or promise by the seller relating to the goods. In a Breach of Warranty Claim, this means the seller clearly stated something true or made a promise about the product being sold, which the buyer relied on when deciding to purchase it.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The seller explicitly stated that the product was “100% waterproof” during the sales presentation.
* The seller provided a written guarantee that the item would function properly for at least five years.
* The seller assured the buyer that the goods were made from “premium quality materials” in all marketing materials.
* The seller verbally promised that the product would meet specific performance standards before the purchase was completed.
* The seller highlighted the product’s unique features, claiming it was the best in its category during the negotiation process. - Element 2. The affirmation of fact or promise became a part of the sale. In a breach of warranty claim, this means that a statement or promise made about a product became an important part of the sale, and if that statement turns out to be false, the buyer can seek a remedy for the issue.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The seller explicitly stated that the product would perform at a certain level, which influenced the buyer’s decision to purchase.
* The buyer relied on the seller’s representations during negotiations, believing them to be part of the agreement.
* The product’s packaging included a warranty statement that was referenced during the sale, indicating it was part of the transaction.
* The seller provided written documentation that included affirmations of quality and performance, which the buyer received before completing the purchase.
* The buyer can demonstrate that they would not have purchased the product without the seller’s affirmations regarding its features and benefits. - Element 3. The plaintiff relied upon affirmation of fact or promise. The plaintiff based their claim on a statement or promise made by the seller about the product, believing it to be true and relying on it when deciding to make the purchase.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The plaintiff purchased the product after the defendant explicitly stated it was “guaranteed to last for five years.”
* The plaintiff relied on the defendant’s advertisement claiming the product was “the best in its class” before making the purchase.
* The plaintiff was assured by the defendant’s sales representative that the product would meet specific performance standards.
* The plaintiff’s decision to buy the product was influenced by the defendant’s written warranty that promised full satisfaction or a money-back guarantee.
* The plaintiff communicated their specific needs to the defendant, who assured them that the product would fulfill those requirements. - Element 4. The goods failed to comply with the affirmations of fact or promise. This means that the product did not match the claims or promises made about it, such as being safe, effective, or of good quality, leading to a situation where the buyer did not receive what they were led to expect.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The product was advertised as being waterproof, yet it failed to keep water out during a light rain.
* The manufacturer claimed the item would last for ten years, but it broke within six months of normal use.
* The packaging stated that the product was made from high-quality materials, but it showed signs of wear and tear after minimal use.
* The seller assured customers that the product was safe for all ages, but it contained small parts that posed a choking hazard to children.
* The warranty explicitly promised a full refund if the product did not meet specified performance standards, which it clearly did not. - Element 5. The plaintiff was injured by the failure of the product to comply with the affirmations of fact or promise. The plaintiff got hurt because the product didn’t live up to the claims or promises made about it, which is a key part of proving a Breach of Warranty Claim.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The product was advertised as being waterproof, yet it failed to protect the user’s belongings from water damage during a rainstorm.
* The manufacturer claimed that the product could withstand extreme temperatures, but it melted when exposed to heat above the stated limit.
* The packaging explicitly stated that the product was safe for children, but it contained hazardous materials that led to a child’s injury.
* The product was marketed as durable and long-lasting, but it broke after only a few uses, contrary to the manufacturer’s claims.
* The user followed all provided instructions, yet the product malfunctioned, resulting in injury, despite assurances of its reliability. - Element 6. The failure to comply with the affirmation of fact or promise was a direct cause of the injury suffered by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s injury happened directly because the seller didn’t keep a promise or statement about the product, showing that the seller’s failure to deliver on their word caused the harm experienced by the buyer.
Facts that might support this element look like:
* The plaintiff relied on the defendant’s affirmation of fact regarding the product’s safety before making the purchase.
* The product malfunctioned shortly after purchase, directly leading to the plaintiff’s injury.
* Expert testimony confirmed that the product did not meet the safety standards promised by the defendant.
* The plaintiff would not have purchased the product had they known the truth about its safety.
* Medical records indicate that the plaintiff’s injuries were specifically caused by the defective product.
(See Great American Products v. Permabond Intern., 94 S. W. 3d 675 (Tex. Court of Appeals 2002).)
If you’re representing yourself in court and plan to assert a Claim of Breach of Warranty, having a Personal Practice of Law at Courtroom5 is essential. You’ll need to make informed decisions about what to file at each phase of your case and prepare legal documents that are supported by thorough legal research and a strong analysis of the facts. Equip yourself with the tools and knowledge necessary to effectively navigate your legal journey.
Prove Your TX Breach of Warranty Claim
U.S. Civil Cases Only
