How To Prove A California Conversion Claim

 

How To Prove A California Conversion Claim

 

In California, a claim of Conversion is defined as:

Any unauthorized act that deprives an owner of personal property without his or her consent.

It simply means:

When someone illegally takes over another’s property.

There are 3 elements of the claim:

  • Element 1. The plaintiff owned or had the right to possess property. The plaintiff either owned the property or had the legal right to use it, meaning they had a claim to it that was recognized by law.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The plaintiff purchased the property in question from a licensed dealer and holds the title in their name.
    * The plaintiff has maintained continuous possession of the property since its acquisition, demonstrating their right to control it.
    * The plaintiff has paid all relevant taxes and fees associated with the property, affirming their ownership rights.
    * The plaintiff has documented evidence, including receipts and photographs, showing their exclusive use of the property over the years.
    * The plaintiff has a written agreement with the previous owner that explicitly grants them the right to possess the property.

  • Element 2. The defendant converted the property by a wrongful act or transfer of property rights. The defendant took or used someone else’s property in a way that was not allowed, effectively treating it as their own, which is a key part of proving a conversion claim.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The defendant took possession of the plaintiff’s property without permission or legal justification.
    * The defendant sold the plaintiff’s property to a third party, despite knowing it belonged to the plaintiff.
    * The defendant intentionally damaged the plaintiff’s property, rendering it unusable and depriving the plaintiff of its value.
    * The defendant refused to return the plaintiff’s property after being requested to do so multiple times.
    * The defendant altered the plaintiff’s property in a way that permanently changed its original condition without consent.

  • Element 3. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the conversion. The plaintiff experienced losses because someone wrongfully took or used their property without permission, which is a key part of proving a conversion claim in court.

    Facts that might support this element look like:

    * The plaintiff’s property was unlawfully taken by the defendant, resulting in a loss of access to essential tools needed for their business operations.
    * The plaintiff incurred significant financial losses due to the inability to use their property, which was wrongfully retained by the defendant for an extended period.
    * The plaintiff was forced to replace the converted property, incurring additional expenses that were not budgeted for in their financial plan.
    * The defendant’s actions caused the plaintiff emotional distress, leading to a decline in their overall well-being and productivity.
    * The plaintiff’s reputation suffered as a result of the defendant’s conversion, leading to lost business opportunities and diminished trust from clients.

(See Burlesci v. Petersen, 80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 704 (Cal. Court of Appeals 1998).)
If you’re in court without a lawyer and plan to assert a Claim of Conversion, having a Personal Practice of Law at Courtroom5 is essential. You’ll need to make informed decisions about what to file at each phase of your case and prepare legal documents supported by thorough legal research and a strong analysis of the facts. Equip yourself with the tools and knowledge to effectively navigate your Claim of Conversion.

Prove Your CA Conversion Claim

U.S. Civil Cases Only

Just a moment please.