Courtroom5

Be Your Own Lawyer

  • How It Works
  • Join Courtroom5
  • Resources
    • The Courts Are Ours
    • Litigation Lifecycle
    • Free 5-Day Course
    • Legal Research
    • Sample Docs
  • Training
  • Workshops
  • Community
  • Blog
  • Sign In
  • My Courtroom5
    • View Subscription
    • Edit Account
    • Edit Profile
  •  

December 1, 2016 By Sonja Ebron Leave a Comment

The Affirmative Defense Of Laches

The pronunciation is the same, but it’s laches, not latches.

Laches - The door has closedYou’d be forgiven for confusing them for other reasons too.

As an affirmative defense, laches argues that the window on filing the claim is latched closed because the claimant waited too long to file it.

Had the claim been filed earlier, perhaps witnesses would have been available, or their memories fresher. Maybe some other evidence could be found to rebut the claim.

As a consequence of the delay, the defendant no longer has a fair chance to fight it.

Remember, an affirmative defense is one in which, even if everything the plaintiff says is true, there should still be no relief.

But because it’s an affirmative defense, the burden of proof falls on the defendant.

The elements that must be proven on an affirmative defense of laches include:

  • knowledge of the claim;
  • unreasonable delay in filing the claim; and
  • prejudice to the defendant caused by the delay.

As an example, Texas governor and 2012 presidential candidate Rick Perry was excluded from the Virginia primary ballot because he had not collected enough signatures by the December 2011 deadline.

One week after being notified that he would not be on the ballot, Perry sued the state in federal court, claiming its certification rules were unconstitutional and demanding that his name be placed on the ballot.

But Perry’s campaign had known about the rules for several months and waited until after the certification deadline to file a complaint. The Virginia primary would be thrown into chaos by Perry’s late challenge to the state’s certification rules. The district court rejected his claim on the basis of laches.

Laches is an equitable defense. That means in most jurisdictions, it only applies to equitable claims like injunctions, foreclosures, breach of contract and so on.

Although some courts combine equity with damage claims, the doctrine of laches is usually not available as a defense to a strict claim for damages.

Laches is not to be confused with a statute of limitations defense. The statute of limitations sets a specific  period of time in which a claim must be filed. It is an actual statute created by legislation.

In contrast, the doctrine of laches does not provide a specific time period for a claim to be filed. And it is understood and followed as part of the common law, not by statute.

Have you used laches as an affirmative defense? Share in the comments below.

More Like This:

  • Elements Are Everything In LitigationElements Are Everything In Litigation
  • Things To Remember When Writing The Answer And Affirmative DefensesThings To Remember When Writing The Answer And…
  • Estoppel, Waiver, And Ratification. Three Affirmative Defenses For When The Plaintiff Was Wrong TooEstoppel, Waiver, And Ratification. Three…

Tagged With: elements of a claim, laches, statute of limitations

ARE YOU READY FOR COURT? LEARN WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN YOUR CASE.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Sonja Ebron

About Sonja Ebron

Sonja Ebron is a co-founder at Courtroom5. She enjoys being underestimated in court and lives to catch a lawyer in a procedural error.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Join Courtroom5 Courtroom5 Membership $19.00 / month
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Learn To Manage Your Case In 5 Days

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Latest Tweets

  • Tweet Avatar Legal Notices. They're Not Sexy, But They Help Move Your Case Along - Courtroom5 #accesstojustice https://t.co/GoBCy2cFaa 1 week ago
    Reply Retweet Favourite
  • Tweet Avatar RT @kalteneder: Important food for thought for #ATJ reformers, innovators and technologists. The rule of law demands that humans us… https://t.co/EXaOWGkRyv 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favourite
  • Tweet Avatar When You Understand Motions And Pleadings You Can Escape Dull Forms and Take Over Your Case - Courtroom5… https://t.co/oF19MS1kTz 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favourite
  • Tweet Avatar Defending and Opposing the Motion to Compel Answers To Discovery - Courtroom5 #accesstojustice https://t.co/O8mjdEOa2r 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favourite
  • Tweet Avatar Tips For Surviving Court Hearings - Courtroom5 #accesstojustice https://t.co/LEZ8VSYVlH 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favourite
Follow @courtroom5legal

Popular Posts

  • How To Plead A Condition Precedent To A Claim
  • How To Oppose A Motion For Summary Judgment
  • 11 Things To Consider When You Need To Sue
  • The Interlocutory Appeal — What, Why and How
  • Martin Luther King Jr On Law and Order
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Burlington Avenue Information Technology, LLC (dba Courtroom5®)
No legal advice is offered through this website or any services offered herein.